Most tools in this category show you their wins. The track record publishes the denominator: every claim NoVo makes is written down before its horizon and scored afterwards, with the sample size on every line and the losing cases left in.

What actually gets scored

Not vibes and not a highlight reel. The morning directional read, the hourly structural audit, the level calls, and on the crypto side the map's pins and extremes — each is recorded with a timestamp before the outcome is known, then graded against what price actually did. Every figure carries the number of observations behind it, because a hit rate without a sample size is a decoration rather than evidence.

The honest limitation

This is NoVo's own log, not an audit by an independent third party, and it should be read that way. It is also not a record of trading performance: NoVo never takes a position, never connects to a brokerage account and places no orders, so there is no P&L to report. What it measures is whether the read held up — which is the only thing an analysis tool can honestly be judged on.

Why the misses stay in

A record that only grows more flattering over time is a marketing asset, not a measurement. When a claim type stops working it gets retired in public rather than quietly deleted, and the retirement is printed alongside the rest. That is the whole point: a scored record is useful precisely because it can embarrass the thing being scored.

How to check it yourself

Read the track record for the current figures and their windows, and the public read archive for the notes themselves, published as they were written. If you are evaluating any tool in this category, the useful question to ask is not “what is your hit rate” but “what is your hit rate and the n behind it, including the periods you would rather not show me”. Related reading: is NoVo legit.